I had been wanting to watch Arth ever since I learnt what 'the other woman' meant. This story of "the other woman" has garnered enough attention and debate in the past two decades.
Arth deals with a much married couple, happy with life and it's everyday chores, until, the husband professes his love for another woman. All his assurances of always "being there" for his wife as a friend, are insufficient to bring back her broken spirit.
How the wife then finds arth in her being and whether a man/woman can find solace without being bound in the comforts of a relationship is what the movie is about.
But, maybe the moral fabric of the early eighties did not allow this privilege to Bhatt.
Some ageless questions that Arth raises -
- Would and should you continue with a love-less marriage, only because you are burdened with an emotionally dependant partner ?
- Will and can there be an end to the roving eye of a partner ? Can an erring husband/wife really remain fidel and be in love forever with a single person ? Can you be sure that they won't leave the second partner for a third, more exciting one ?
- If the tables are turned, will the erring partner, be magnanimous enough to forgive and forget and re-build a relationship ?
- Is it necessary to be in a relationship at all to complete oneself ?
God only knows what went wrong with his brain later on.
